Botox is arguably the most well-known injection, but you should consider Dysport. Both of these injections may significantly minimize the look of wrinkles on the face, but are they safe? Here’s what you need to know about these treatment choices to choose the best one for you:
What is Dysport?
Dysport is a botulinum toxin injection that inhibits nerve impulses to muscles in a specific location. Dysport has been used in Europe since 1990, but it was not approved for use in the United States by the FDA until 2009. This injection mainly treats moderate to severe wrinkles in the glabella or brow region.
Pros and Cons of Dysport
As with any therapy, there are advantages and disadvantages to using Dysport injections to alleviate face wrinkles. Here are some of the many aspects to consider to make the best decision:
- Only one part of the face has been allowed for treatment – the glabella, or the area between your brows.
- It is somewhat less expensive than Botox, with an average treatment costing $450.
- Provides immediate benefits that begin to manifest a few days following therapy.
- Treatments provide transitory benefits that usually last three to four months.
- It is considered less invasive and has a short recovery period.
What Is Botox?
Botox is a botulinum toxin injection that momentarily paralyzes the muscles in the treated region. Botox has been used in the United States for decades after getting FDA clearance in 1991.
This injection may smooth out mild, moderate, and severe wrinkles. It is also permitted to treat a variety of regions, including the forehead, eye corners, and between the brows.
Pros and Cons of Botox
Let’s examine some of the benefits and drawbacks of Dysport vs. Botox to get a sense of what each product has to offer:
- Botox is permitted for use in three regions of the face: the forehead, the corners of the eyes for crow’s feet, and the glabella for brow creases.
- Botox is significantly more costly than Dysport, costing an average session of $550. However, It should be noted that one unit of Botox is comparable to three units of Dysport – therefore, costs per unit may be misleading.
- Botox results may take longer to manifest than Dysport outcomes, frequently requiring several weeks to see ultimate results.
- Botox treatments can provide transitory benefits lasting three to six months — somewhat longer than Dysport.
- Botox, like Dysport, is considered less invasive and has a rapid recovery period.
Are Botox and Dysport Safe?
The good news is that Botox and Dysport are both completely safe and FDA-approved wrinkle treatments. However, each medical therapy has the possibility of unforeseen side effects, and Dysport and Botox are no exception.
Botulinum toxicity, which happens when the injection travels to another portion of the body, is a minor risk with both Dysport and Botox. Botulinum poisoning symptoms include drooping eyelids, facial muscular weakness, muscle spasms, trouble swallowing, eating, breathing, or speaking. If you see any of these symptoms, get emergency medical attention immediately.
Furthermore, both Dysport and Botox have the possibility of mild adverse effects. Dysport side effects include injection site discomfort, swelling around the eyes, rash, infection, and headaches. These negative effects should subside in a few days. Nausea, sinusitis, and upper respiratory problems are among the most significant adverse effects of Dysport.
Redness, swelling, bruising, pain, numbness, and headache are some of the most prevalent Botox adverse effects. These negative effects should subside within a week. A more dangerous and uncommon adverse effect of Botox is lifelong paralysis.
Key Distinctions Between Dysport and Botox
Exploring the key distinctions between Dysport and Botox unveils critical factors influencing the choice between these two popular wrinkle-reducing treatments.
1. Treatment Area:
- Dysport: Specialized in treating the glabella, Dysport excels in addressing age-induced frown lines, particularly deep creases in the area between the eyebrows. How does this specific treatment area make Dysport suitable for targeted wrinkle reduction, and in what scenarios might this be advantageous?
- Botox: In contrast, Botox is versatile and approved for treating a broader spectrum of wrinkles, including frown lines, forehead lines, deep wrinkles, crow’s feet, and more. What implications does Botox’s wider treatment range have for individuals seeking comprehensive facial rejuvenation?
There’s a common misconception regarding the effectiveness of Dysport compared to Botox. While some may perceive Botox as superior due to its potency, the choice between the two often depends on individual muscle mobility as assessed by the provider. How does the perception of potency influence the decision-making process, and what considerations should individuals consider when evaluating these treatments?
Dysport and Botox exhibit varying downtimes, according to research. Both methods have a clinical onset period of 24-48 hours, but they reach full effect at different intervals. Dysport may take around seven days to show full effects, while Botox may require 10-14 days. How does the difference in downtime impact the expectations and preferences of individuals seeking quick results, and what factors contribute to these varied timelines?
Understanding these key distinctions empowers individuals to make informed decisions based on their unique preferences, treatment goals, and the advice of experienced providers.
Which Option Is Best for You, Dysport or Botox?
Based on everything we’ve covered, how can you decide if Botox or Dysport is your best treatment choice? It would help to think about the parts of your face you want to fix and the severity of your existing wrinkles.
Dysport may be perfect for addressing severe lines around your glabella. If, on the other hand, you want to fix tiny wrinkles on your forehead, you should go for Botox. Speaking with a trained and experienced medical practitioner may be the best way to evaluate which choice is best for you.
Where to Get Dysport or Botox?
While you can obtain Dysport or Botox injections at locations like Medspas, this surgery is best done by a skilled plastic surgeon. This is because board-certified plastic surgeons spend years studying the anatomy and composition of the face to inject each drop into the correct spot.
Furthermore, cosmetic surgeons can advise you on the best course of therapy, proposing medicines other than Botox or Dysport that might help you reach your desired outcomes.
For example, injections may not be enough to address severe wrinkles or sagging skin. Instead, consider a surgical treatment to remove and raise sagging skin for a more youthful look.
No matter what sorts of operations you’re interested in, you should constantly evaluate the provider’s expertise and testimonies. Dr. Roel Galope has almost 30 years of expertise as a board-certified plastic surgeon in Fair Lawn NJ, and throughout that time, he has received several outstanding patient ratings.
If you’re still undecided between Dysport and Botox to remove persistent wrinkles, please contact Dr. Roel Galope for a FREE consultation in person at our Fair Lawn NJ clinic or electronically.
Dr. Roel Galope has been regarded as a pioneer in laser technology methods for plastic surgery treatments over almost 30 years of practice. He has written several articles and research papers on the use of laser technology and lectures to doctors all over the globe about its services in plastic surgery. Dr. Roel Galope mainly works out of his Fair Lawn NJ private outpatient surgery location, 25-15 Fair Lawn Ave Lower Level R Fair Lawn.